The Chronicle of Higher Ed has an interesting article about blogging as an academic on a job search. The long and short of the advice? Just don’t do it.
We all have quirks. In a traditional interview process, we try our best to stifle them, or keep them below the threshold of annoyance and distraction. The search committee is composed of humans, who know that the applicants are humans, too, who have those things to hide. It’s in your interest, as an applicant, for them to stay hidden, not laid out in exquisite detail for all the world to read. If you stick your foot in your mouth during an interview, no one will interrupt to prevent you from doing further damage. So why risk doing it many times over by blabbing away in a blog?
We’ve seen the hapless job seekers who destroy the good thing they’ve got going on paper by being so irritating in person that we can’t wait to put them back on a plane. Our blogger applicants came off reasonably well at the initial interview, but once we hung up the phone and called up their blogs, we got to know “the real them” — better than we wanted, enough to conclude we didn’t want to know more.
It’s probably worth noting that most of the blogs that candidates had were personal blogs, in which they overshared their lives.
September 30th, 2009 at 1:21 pm
My blog about personal things is deliberately hard to find and only available for those who are close friends. My public face is designed to keep personal details at a minimum.
October 10th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
I think the job candidates seemed to have really obvious blogs. I’m not sure why, but it’s not impossible to hide them, as you do.