<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the UK, potential bosses consider your womb</title>
	<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/</link>
	<description>news, notes, &#038; tips about spirituality and religion in the workplace</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: h sofia</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3094</link>
		<author>h sofia</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>Ms. T - good point - current business models to tend to treat sickness, death, and pregnancy as "abnormalities" although ... when I think about it, that makes absolutely zero sense. A real case of doublethink ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. T - good point - current business models to tend to treat sickness, death, and pregnancy as &#8220;abnormalities&#8221; although &#8230; when I think about it, that makes absolutely zero sense. A real case of doublethink &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Theologian</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3090</link>
		<author>Ms. Theologian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>I'm not particularly arguing with you as thinking in comment form....so forgive. :)

In places I've worked and consulted, "normal circumstances" are few and far between, so to me we have to consider all those times when someone has to leave early, or is sick, or on medical leave, or on maternity leave as part of "normal" rather than exceptions to the human experience in the workplace and then staff accordingly. Because the alternative seems to be that we discriminate against people or resent them for perfectly normal human behaviors.... Perhaps there's some middle ground here? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not particularly arguing with you as thinking in comment form&#8230;.so forgive. <img src='http://survivingtheworkday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In places I&#8217;ve worked and consulted, &#8220;normal circumstances&#8221; are few and far between, so to me we have to consider all those times when someone has to leave early, or is sick, or on medical leave, or on maternity leave as part of &#8220;normal&#8221; rather than exceptions to the human experience in the workplace and then staff accordingly. Because the alternative seems to be that we discriminate against people or resent them for perfectly normal human behaviors&#8230;. Perhaps there&#8217;s some middle ground here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GhostGirl</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3089</link>
		<author>GhostGirl</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>Speaking from experience, having pregnant people in the group SUCKS--either you have to get a temp (it generally takes three months to train a person in our group, so that's out) or you have to divide up the work and cover for them. I'd say we have exactly enough people to get the job done in normal circumstances, so it's not only affecting understaffed companies. For the people left behind, it can be really, really stressful.

BUT, I understand also that it could easily be me. Or it could be someone with cancer, or with a sick parent, or whatever. It's the risk you have to take when you hire humans and not machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking from experience, having pregnant people in the group SUCKS&#8211;either you have to get a temp (it generally takes three months to train a person in our group, so that&#8217;s out) or you have to divide up the work and cover for them. I&#8217;d say we have exactly enough people to get the job done in normal circumstances, so it&#8217;s not only affecting understaffed companies. For the people left behind, it can be really, really stressful.</p>
<p>BUT, I understand also that it could easily be me. Or it could be someone with cancer, or with a sick parent, or whatever. It&#8217;s the risk you have to take when you hire humans and not machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Theologian</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3083</link>
		<author>Ms. Theologian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>I'm thinking that it's really part of a larger issue about businesses being run with such lean staffing (read lean = understaffed) that there is scrambling around when anyone is sick, not to mention extended leaves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking that it&#8217;s really part of a larger issue about businesses being run with such lean staffing (read lean = understaffed) that there is scrambling around when anyone is sick, not to mention extended leaves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h sofia</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3081</link>
		<author>h sofia</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2008/05/07/in-the-uk-potential-bosses-consider-your-womb/#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>It's unfortunate, but it makes sense. They are thinking about the business's immediate needs - most likely because that is what their performance is rated by. I wonder what the numbers would be like if the question was phrased more generically to refer to any kind of medical procedure with prolonged leave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate, but it makes sense. They are thinking about the business&#8217;s immediate needs - most likely because that is what their performance is rated by. I wonder what the numbers would be like if the question was phrased more generically to refer to any kind of medical procedure with prolonged leave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
