<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips for Learning New Technology</title>
	<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/</link>
	<description>spirituality in the workplace</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: ghost girl hubby</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-955</link>
		<author>ghost girl hubby</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>I agree with Kevin 100% about our education system, and teaching technology. The first thing I learned about teaching: different people learn in different ways. 

Any article, discussion, or concept that tries to teach people by using any method is bound to fail some people, because they do not learn that way. 

Technology is no different. I agree that many people would learn better if they understood all the concepts. But at the same time, many people would be confused / overwhelmed by the concept, so teaching them the actual tools to do what they need to do works better.

But to use an analogy--imagine building a house. You have a guy who has never built anything, but wants to help. You need someone to hammer nails. Is it important to teach this person the concept behind hammering nails, how they hold the wood frame together, how this frame supports the walls, roof, etc. Or, is it important to teach him how to hit a nail, how to know it went into the other piece of wood, and where to hit the nails? Conceptual understanding is often over-rated...as a manager, not hiding conceptual information, but only providing enough for the person to do the job that needs to get done, is usually ideal.

In software / computers, the same logic applies. Yes, you can teach someone conceptually about all the functions in Word. You can teach mail merges, tracking changes, etc...but if all they want is to write a letter, why bother? I believe information overload is just as big a problem as not enough information--finding the right balance is the truly difficult part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kevin 100% about our education system, and teaching technology. The first thing I learned about teaching: different people learn in different ways. </p>
<p>Any article, discussion, or concept that tries to teach people by using any method is bound to fail some people, because they do not learn that way. </p>
<p>Technology is no different. I agree that many people would learn better if they understood all the concepts. But at the same time, many people would be confused / overwhelmed by the concept, so teaching them the actual tools to do what they need to do works better.</p>
<p>But to use an analogy&#8211;imagine building a house. You have a guy who has never built anything, but wants to help. You need someone to hammer nails. Is it important to teach this person the concept behind hammering nails, how they hold the wood frame together, how this frame supports the walls, roof, etc. Or, is it important to teach him how to hit a nail, how to know it went into the other piece of wood, and where to hit the nails? Conceptual understanding is often over-rated&#8230;as a manager, not hiding conceptual information, but only providing enough for the person to do the job that needs to get done, is usually ideal.</p>
<p>In software / computers, the same logic applies. Yes, you can teach someone conceptually about all the functions in Word. You can teach mail merges, tracking changes, etc&#8230;but if all they want is to write a letter, why bother? I believe information overload is just as big a problem as not enough information&#8211;finding the right balance is the truly difficult part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Kevin</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-948</link>
		<author>Comrade Kevin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-948</guid>
		<description>One of my pet peeves is that our educational system relies so heavily on one-size-fits-all-approaches when truly successful educational strategies
synthesize a variety of disciplines to make learning applicable to the student.

And this goes for teaching people about technology as well as any other subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my pet peeves is that our educational system relies so heavily on one-size-fits-all-approaches when truly successful educational strategies<br />
synthesize a variety of disciplines to make learning applicable to the student.</p>
<p>And this goes for teaching people about technology as well as any other subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Theologian</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-946</link>
		<author>Ms. Theologian</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>It's funny, Donald, because it's really basic educational theory about how we learn, but people love those 1, 2, 3, 4 lists of what to click, just like they like their textbooks written that way...pity. I think your class idea is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, Donald, because it&#8217;s really basic educational theory about how we learn, but people love those 1, 2, 3, 4 lists of what to click, just like they like their textbooks written that way&#8230;pity. I think your class idea is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald O'Bloggin</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-943</link>
		<author>Donald O'Bloggin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Many technologists have known this for a long time, and indeed the conceptional level teaching is what geeks and hackers have used as the basis for their sharing of information. 

It's always been my biggest of pet peeves that our high schools teach people how to use computer programmes, like Word or Excel, and never teach the concepts behind them.

A well made lab and class would contain 1/2 Windows Machines (half of which would be using the newest version of Windows, half of which an older version), 1/4 Macs, and 1/4 some Linux/Unix system with a GUI.

Students would have to create their works, whether learning spreadsheets or anything else, on whatever computer they were at, after the lectures go over the concepts behind what's going on.

But I'm just the Geek, and like red headed bastard step children, managers and administrators never want to hear from us, and like us locked up in the cages with the network switches and servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many technologists have known this for a long time, and indeed the conceptional level teaching is what geeks and hackers have used as the basis for their sharing of information. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always been my biggest of pet peeves that our high schools teach people how to use computer programmes, like Word or Excel, and never teach the concepts behind them.</p>
<p>A well made lab and class would contain 1/2 Windows Machines (half of which would be using the newest version of Windows, half of which an older version), 1/4 Macs, and 1/4 some Linux/Unix system with a GUI.</p>
<p>Students would have to create their works, whether learning spreadsheets or anything else, on whatever computer they were at, after the lectures go over the concepts behind what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m just the Geek, and like red headed bastard step children, managers and administrators never want to hear from us, and like us locked up in the cages with the network switches and servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Theologian</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-940</link>
		<author>Ms. Theologian</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Huh. And to think that I wasn't sure you used food analogies....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. And to think that I wasn&#8217;t sure you used food analogies&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne P</title>
		<link>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-938</link>
		<author>Anne P</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://survivingtheworkday.com/2007/12/17/tips-for-learning-new-technology/#comment-938</guid>
		<description>How well you know me.  A half hour ago I compared the odd issues with this computer I'm working on to an egg that's been scrambled without breaking the shell; not impossible but definitely unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How well you know me.  A half hour ago I compared the odd issues with this computer I&#8217;m working on to an egg that&#8217;s been scrambled without breaking the shell; not impossible but definitely unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
