Dear Ms Theologian–
What do you think of this?
-Curious
Dear Curious:
Ms. Theologian is reminded of when she was a little girl and she spent the night at her friend Heather’s house. Heather’s mom took the girls aside and told them that sex toys were bad, because they made you reliant on something other than your partner’s parts and machinations.
Ms. Theologian had no fucking idea what Heather’s mom was talking about at the time, and went back to rollerskating around the condo complex with a pompom on her head (she was trying to be Rollerderby Raggedy Ann).
Ms. Theologian is by her nature oblivious to much, including sex toys that resemble religious figures, such as Jesus, Mary, and Buddha.
So what does she think about them?
Restricting sexual behavior is the territory of most conservative branches of religions, who are so preoccupied with sex that one might just want to send them one of the products from Divine Interventions to play with and get over it. Many religions have basically banned practices that are non-procreative in nature including what one might do with a dildo or butt plug but also including oral sex, anal sex, sex between two people who can’t procreate in an egg-meet-sperm way, and other things I probably don’t know about, but someone will now choose to inform me.
So here’s how Ms. Theologian sees it: Human beings at their most basic nature are sexual creatures, just like all other animals; they are also spiritual creatures (and Ms. Theologian will save arguing for the spirituality of her dog for another time—ah, but watch her sniff the fall air for squirrel and know how she enjoys to be alive in the moment!). So there is absolutely no conflict between sex and spirituality. There is just about always a conflict between sexuality and religion (the organized (mostly) group pursuit of spirituality).
Now Jesus had little to nothing to say about sex. Seriously. People make a big deal about him chastising a woman for her past in John 4:16-18, but other interpretations of this passage are just that he was showing off that he knew her in order for her to recognize him as a prophet. And it worked.
There’s another somewhat relevant passage in John (John 8:1-11) that is known to be added at a later date (a forgery!). In this passage, Jesus tells people that the person to throw the first stone at an adulterer must be without sin. And you know how that goes. No stones were thrown.
And then we have Matthew 5:31 and Matthew 19:9 in which we learn Jesus didn’t like adultery. Well, neither does Ms. Theologian. For more information on Christiantity and Sex, you might read Religious Tolerance’s excellent treatment of the topic.
So if you want to know what Jesus said about sex, you’ll have use his ethical teachings: treat your neighbor as you wish to be treated; don’t be exploitative, manipulative, domineeering of others, don’t abuse children.
So, in short, Ms. Theologian thinks that Jesus would be totally okay with the products offered at Divine Interventions (though she might argue that the description of the Judas dildo (Imagine if he could fuck the son of God what he could do for you) does not appreciate more recent revelations that Judas didn’t really betray Jesus, but that Jesus asked Judas to turn Jesus in).
While she’s on the petty point podium, she would also like to note that the reason Divine Interventions ships more dildos to Texas is because dildos are illegal to purchase in Texas, not necessarily because more people in Texas use dildos as implied in the Village Voice article.
Now where are Ms. Theologian’s roller skates?
-Ms. Theologian
P.S. If you would like to write to Ms. Theologian, send an email to ms dot theologian at gmail dot com.